"Stu" discusses JBI P2O vs. competitors'

Why I held (and accumulated): I cannot understand how some people on this board are crying that JBI hasn't gone fully live with their P2O technology after working on it for almost a whole year. And yet the incumbents are .. ahem.. live with theirs and have years and "years of experience" doing P2O.

I wonder how many of them went from concept to fully operational in under a year. My guess is none. So no P2O technology was conceived-of, tested, vetted, permitted and launched as fast as JBI.

Further to that, despite claims to the contrary here on this board, none of the competitors (Nill-Tech, NTIC, Plas2Fuel, Envion, Polymer Energy, Splainex, Donghe, Global Resource Corp., STEPS, Natural State Research, etc..) has the yield, processing speed, fuel output quality, residue quality, required energy input, compact footprint, and low capex that JBI has. None.

The process of pyrolysis is not new -- neither Ozmotech, nor Polymer Energy "designed" it. They simply took the process and made changes and called it their own. That's what JBI has done too. Only all signs point to JBI having done it far better.

Processor size: 50m2
Processor cost: $200k
Process rate: 1000kg in under 10 minutes
Process net energy input: (negative)
Process yield: 99%
Process output: 85% diesel / 15% gasoline, virtually no sulphur, water, or sedimentation
Process air exhaust: nothing but heat

Can you provide us with these numbers for the competitors please? Because if you did, and you looked at the total ROI of their process versus JBI's, you will be shocked by the difference.

And kudos to JBI for buying off-the-shelf components such as the reactor and the condensers -- why reinvent the wheel there?

When the rest of the world gets wind of this, and when P2O revenue starts, JBII will see triple digits.