righty discusses naysayers' ridiculous "bear crap" posts

"I really don't know.. if they need such a permit or not."

well...I really don't know if anyone really knows, who would know, or if anyone in the know, KNOWS, if a permit is required to build the machine that needs a permit, OR EVEN IF IT IS PERMITTED to build it, before you have a permit.....
YA KNOW?

This debate is about as ridiculous as the debate about shares becoming re-restricted after their restrictions are unrestricted.

PERMIT ME TO ELABORATE

No .....wait, I do believe the debate about fuel registrations being required when the end use buyer's intended use for the produced product is not even in the public domain, and the product is not even being produced en masse or sold yet.... tops all of these useless debates.

But I would not want to give any slack to the debate about p20 ships, and their non appearance on the high seas whilst the actual p20 machine is not even in all out production mode yet.

All of the above might be easier to comprehend, or at least be easier to have useful debates about, if the company would simply waste their time answering questions from all the non shareholders who are asking questions on these subjects, on the auspices that they would like to know before they invest, when we all know that simply cannot be the case, and frankly why would the company bother?

Think about this, literally all of these questions from these debates at one time or another have already been answered by non-shareholders, wielding incorrect and/OR assumed/IRRELEVANT information?

Yup....took 5 minutes today to try and catch up on the last 2 weeks, and I see about a 70/30 mix of fact/bear crap. RESPECTIVELY