Well if it is not illegal, then how the hell can you deem it a "swindle" based on that presumptuous contrived statement?
Look I can appreciate a contrarian point of view, but at the end of the day nobody who is uncomfortable with these parameters need invest at this stage...NOW DO THEY?
IN MY OPINION...IF one is skeptical then simply wait until the production/sales element has begun.
Proof will indeed be in that pudding?
As for the constant comparisons to some biomass company.....?
Please...there is a world of difference inbetwixt, I get the profound impression if a certain shareholder was NOT present, none of those comparisons would happen.
Coming in here swinging the scam word around with personal insults towards shareholders and officers is disingenuos at best. I seem to recall a number of false statements being made at the behest of far less than perfect DD...appreciate the apologies...but that jacket is made of cellophane in my opinion.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please comment on this post.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.